Community leader Rev. Michael Pfleger joined gun violence survivors and advocates this week in calling for clearer answers from city officials about what will replace the ShotSpotter gunshot detection system in Chicago, according to Fox 32 Chicago.
The discussion comes as the city continues to evaluate alternatives after ending its contract with ShotSpotter, a technology that used acoustic sensors to detect and locate possible gunfire and alert police in real time. The system had been used in several high-violence areas across Chicago, but has also faced criticism over accuracy, cost, and its overall effectiveness in reducing crime.
During the community gathering, survivors of gun violence shared personal stories about delayed emergency responses and the need for faster, more reliable tools to respond to shootings. Many expressed concern that the removal of ShotSpotter could create gaps in emergency response times if a suitable replacement is not clearly established.
Pfleger emphasized that communities most impacted by gun violence deserve a seat at the table when decisions about public safety technology are made. He and other advocates urged city leaders to be transparent about what system—or combination of systems—will be used moving forward, and how it will improve response times in neighborhoods that continue to experience high levels of violence.
City officials have previously stated that they are exploring multiple public safety strategies, including alternative technologies and increased investment in community-based violence prevention programs. However, residents say more detailed information is needed about timelines, effectiveness, and accountability measures.
Gun violence survivors also stressed that technology alone is not enough, calling for a broader approach that includes mental health services, youth programs, and stronger community investment alongside law enforcement tools.
As the debate continues, advocates are pushing for urgency and clarity, saying that every second matters when responding to shootings—and that communities deserve a system they can trust.
